Comparing Auditors And Users Materiality Judgments For Esg And Traditional Financial Disclosures

Download Comparing Auditors And Users Materiality Judgments For Esg And Traditional Financial Disclosures full books in PDF, epub, and Kindle. Read online free Comparing Auditors And Users Materiality Judgments For Esg And Traditional Financial Disclosures ebook anywhere anytime directly on your device. Fast Download speed and no annoying ads. We cannot guarantee that every ebooks is available!

Comparing Auditors' and Users' Materiality Judgments for ESG and Traditional Financial Disclosures

Comparing Auditors' and Users' Materiality Judgments for ESG and Traditional Financial Disclosures
Author :
Publisher :
Total Pages : 0
Release :
ISBN-10 : OCLC:1378824068
ISBN-13 :
Rating : 4/5 ( Downloads)

Book Synopsis Comparing Auditors' and Users' Materiality Judgments for ESG and Traditional Financial Disclosures by : Marcus Doxey

Download or read book Comparing Auditors' and Users' Materiality Judgments for ESG and Traditional Financial Disclosures written by Marcus Doxey and published by . This book was released on 2023 with total page 0 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: As corporate ESG disclosures continue to grow in prominence and regulators begin to require attestation over ESG information, understanding the factors that influence ESG materiality assessments can help auditors provide more effective assurance over ESG information. We use an experiment to compare professional assurance providers' and users' materiality assessments of ESG disclosures compared to traditional financial disclosures. Not only do ESG disclosures serve different informational purposes than financial disclosures, they also include relatively more positive and qualitative information. Our results indicate that the decision context associated with ESG disclosures as well as information valence and form contribute to less effective auditor materiality assessments. Specifically, we document that the auditor-user materiality gap widens for qualitative and positive disclosures of traditional financial information as well as ESG disclosures in general. Additionally, in contrast to users' normative materiality assessments, we find that auditors view disclosures that receive limited assurance as less material than those that are reasonably assured, which further widens the materiality gap. While current ESG disclosure guidelines focus on topical materiality, this study document evidence of other important theory-based disclosure features that influence materiality judgments and can be used to improve the dissemination and attestation of ESG disclosures.


Comparing Auditors' and Users' Materiality Judgments for ESG and Traditional Financial Disclosures Related Books