Lonnie Lee Burton Petitioner V Douglas Waddington Superintendent Stafford Creek Corrections Center Respondent On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit

Download Lonnie Lee Burton Petitioner V Douglas Waddington Superintendent Stafford Creek Corrections Center Respondent On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit full books in PDF, epub, and Kindle. Read online free Lonnie Lee Burton Petitioner V Douglas Waddington Superintendent Stafford Creek Corrections Center Respondent On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit ebook anywhere anytime directly on your device. Fast Download speed and no annoying ads. We cannot guarantee that every ebooks is available!

Lonnie Lee Burton, Petitioner V. Douglas Waddington, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center, Respondent, on Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Lonnie Lee Burton, Petitioner V. Douglas Waddington, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center, Respondent, on Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Author :
Publisher :
Total Pages : 44
Release :
ISBN-10 : STANFORD:36105063744523
ISBN-13 :
Rating : 4/5 ( Downloads)

Book Synopsis Lonnie Lee Burton, Petitioner V. Douglas Waddington, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center, Respondent, on Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by : Robert A. Ratliff

Download or read book Lonnie Lee Burton, Petitioner V. Douglas Waddington, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center, Respondent, on Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit written by Robert A. Ratliff and published by . This book was released on 2006 with total page 44 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Question presented in Lonnie L. Burton's petition for writ of certioriari is: Mr. Burton was given an exceptional sentence of 258 months above the 304 month ceiling of the statutory sentencin range, and this Washington state sentence became final after Apprendi v. New Jersy, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), but before Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004). 1. Is the holding in Blakely a new rule or is it dictated by Apprendi? 2. If Blakely is a new rule, does its requirements that facts resulting in an enhanced statutory maximum be proved beyond a reasonable doubt apply retroactively?


Lonnie Lee Burton, Petitioner V. Douglas Waddington, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center, Respondent, on Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Related Books