A Democratic Theory Of Judgment

Download A Democratic Theory Of Judgment full books in PDF, epub, and Kindle. Read online free A Democratic Theory Of Judgment ebook anywhere anytime directly on your device. Fast Download speed and no annoying ads. We cannot guarantee that every ebooks is available!

A Democratic Theory of Judgment

A Democratic Theory of Judgment
Author :
Publisher : University of Chicago Press
Total Pages : 401
Release :
ISBN-10 : 9780226398037
ISBN-13 : 022639803X
Rating : 4/5 (03X Downloads)

Book Synopsis A Democratic Theory of Judgment by : Linda M.G. Zerilli

Download or read book A Democratic Theory of Judgment written by Linda M.G. Zerilli and published by University of Chicago Press. This book was released on 2016-12-12 with total page 401 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: In this sweeping look at political and philosophical history, Linda M. G. Zerilli unpacks the tightly woven core of Hannah Arendt’s unfinished work on a tenacious modern problem: how to judge critically in the wake of the collapse of inherited criteria of judgment. Engaging a remarkable breadth of thinkers, including Ludwig Wittgenstein, Leo Strauss, Immanuel Kant, Frederick Douglass, John Rawls, Jürgen Habermas, Martha Nussbaum, and many others, Zerilli clears a hopeful path between an untenable universalism and a cultural relativism that forever defers the possibility of judging at all. Zerilli deftly outlines the limitations of existing debates, both those that concern themselves with the impossibility of judging across cultures and those that try to find transcendental, rational values to anchor judgment. Looking at Kant through the lens of Arendt, Zerilli develops the notion of a public conception of truth, and from there she explores relativism, historicism, and universalism as they shape feminist approaches to judgment. Following Arendt even further, Zerilli arrives at a hopeful new pathway—seeing the collapse of philosophical criteria for judgment not as a problem but a way to practice judgment anew as a world-building activity of democratic citizens. The result is an astonishing theoretical argument that travels through—and goes beyond—some of the most important political thought of the modern period.


A Democratic Theory of Judgment Related Books

A Democratic Theory of Judgment
Language: en
Pages: 401
Authors: Linda M.G. Zerilli
Categories: Philosophy
Type: BOOK - Published: 2016-12-12 - Publisher: University of Chicago Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

In this sweeping look at political and philosophical history, Linda M. G. Zerilli unpacks the tightly woven core of Hannah Arendt’s unfinished work on a tenac
The State of Democratic Theory
Language: en
Pages: 196
Authors: Ian Shapiro
Categories: Political Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2009-01-10 - Publisher: Princeton University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

What should we expect from democracy, and how likely is it that democracies will live up to those expectations? In The State of Democratic Theory, Ian Shapiro o
A Democratic Theory of Judgment
Language: en
Pages: 401
Authors: Linda M. G. Zerilli
Categories: History
Type: BOOK - Published: 2016-12-12 - Publisher: University of Chicago Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Democracy and the problem of judgment -- Judging at the "end of reasons": rethinking the aesthetic turn -- Historicism, judgment, and the limits of liberalism:
Becoming Political
Language: en
Pages: 189
Authors: Christopher Skeaff
Categories: Philosophy
Type: BOOK - Published: 2018-06-25 - Publisher: University of Chicago Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

In this pathbreaking work, Christopher Skeaff argues that a profoundly democratic conception of judgment is at the heart of Spinoza’s thought. Bridging Contin
Knowing Democracy – A Pragmatist Account of the Epistemic Dimension in Democratic Politics
Language: en
Pages: 218
Authors: Michael I. Räber
Categories: Philosophy
Type: BOOK - Published: 2020-10-06 - Publisher: Springer Nature

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

How can we justify democracy’s trust in the political judgments of ordinary people? In Knowing Democracy, Michael Räber situates this question between two do