Justice And Egalitarian Relations

Download Justice And Egalitarian Relations full books in PDF, epub, and Kindle. Read online free Justice And Egalitarian Relations ebook anywhere anytime directly on your device. Fast Download speed and no annoying ads. We cannot guarantee that every ebooks is available!

Justice and Egalitarian Relations

Justice and Egalitarian Relations
Author :
Publisher : Oxford University Press
Total Pages : 337
Release :
ISBN-10 : 9780190084264
ISBN-13 : 019008426X
Rating : 4/5 (26X Downloads)

Book Synopsis Justice and Egalitarian Relations by : Christian Schemmel

Download or read book Justice and Egalitarian Relations written by Christian Schemmel and published by Oxford University Press. This book was released on 2021-03-05 with total page 337 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Why does equality matter, as a social and political value, and what does it require? Relational egalitarians argue that it does not require that people receive equal distributive shares of some good, but that they relate as equals. Christian Schemmel here provides the first comprehensive development of a liberal conception of relational equality, one which understands relations of non-domination and egalitarian norms of social status as stringent demands of social justice. He first argues that expressing respect for the freedom and equality of individuals in social cooperation requires stringent protections against domination. Taking this as a starting point, he then develops a substantive, liberal conception of non-domination and argues that non-domination is a particularly important, but not the only, concern of social justice. From there, Schemmel develops an account of the wrongness of inegalitarian norms of social status which shows how status-induced foreclosure of important social opportunities is a social injustice in its own right, over and above the role of status inequality in enabling domination, and the threats it poses to individuals' self-respect. Finally, Schemmel articulates the implications of liberal relational egalitarianism for political, economic, and health justice, showing that it demands, in practice, far-reaching forms of equality in all three domains. With expert rigor and creativity, Justice and Egalitarian Relations brings together scholarship in a variety of related topics, from social justice and liberalism to distributive and social equality, republicanism, non-domination, and self-respect.


Justice and Egalitarian Relations Related Books

Justice and Egalitarian Relations
Language: en
Pages: 337
Authors: Christian Schemmel
Categories: Philosophy
Type: BOOK - Published: 2021-03-05 - Publisher: Oxford University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Why does equality matter, as a social and political value, and what does it require? Relational egalitarians argue that it does not require that people receive
Relational Egalitarianism
Language: en
Pages: 267
Authors: Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2018-09-20 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Explores the nature of the ideal of relational equality and how it relates to distributive ideals of justice.
Social Equality
Language: en
Pages: 257
Authors: Carina Fourie
Categories: Philosophy
Type: BOOK - Published: 2015 - Publisher:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Is equality valuable? This question dominates many discussions of social justice, which tend to center on whether certain forms of distributive equality are val
Distributive Justice and Access to Advantage
Language: en
Pages: 287
Authors: Alexander Kaufman
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2015 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Major scholars assess G. A. Cohen's contribution to the debate on the nature of egalitarian justice.
Rawls's Egalitarianism
Language: en
Pages: 285
Authors: Alexander Kaufman
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2018-06-14 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

A new analysis of John Rawls's theory of distributive justice, focusing on the ways his ideas have both influenced and been misinterpreted by the current egalit