The Criterion For Distinguishing Legal Opinions From Judicial Rulings And The Administrative Acts Of Judges And Rulers

Download The Criterion For Distinguishing Legal Opinions From Judicial Rulings And The Administrative Acts Of Judges And Rulers full books in PDF, epub, and Kindle. Read online free The Criterion For Distinguishing Legal Opinions From Judicial Rulings And The Administrative Acts Of Judges And Rulers ebook anywhere anytime directly on your device. Fast Download speed and no annoying ads. We cannot guarantee that every ebooks is available!

The Criterion for Distinguishing Legal Opinions from Judicial Rulings and the Administrative Acts of Judges and Rulers

The Criterion for Distinguishing Legal Opinions from Judicial Rulings and the Administrative Acts of Judges and Rulers
Author :
Publisher : Yale University Press
Total Pages : 353
Release :
ISBN-10 : 9780300227567
ISBN-13 : 0300227566
Rating : 4/5 (566 Downloads)

Book Synopsis The Criterion for Distinguishing Legal Opinions from Judicial Rulings and the Administrative Acts of Judges and Rulers by : Shihab al‑Din al‑Qarafi

Download or read book The Criterion for Distinguishing Legal Opinions from Judicial Rulings and the Administrative Acts of Judges and Rulers written by Shihab al‑Din al‑Qarafi and published by Yale University Press. This book was released on 2017-05-23 with total page 353 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: The first and much-needed English translation of a thirteenth-century text that shaped the development of Islamic law in the late middle ages. Scholars of Islamic law can find few English language translations of foundational Islamic legal texts, particularly from the understudied Mamluk era. In this edition of the Tamyiz, Mohammad Fadel addresses this gap, finally making the great Muslim jurist Shihab al-Din al-Qarafi’s seminal work available to a wider audience. Al-Qarafi’s examination of the distinctions among judicial rulings, which were final and unassailable, legal opinions, which were advisory and not binding, and administrative actions, which were binding but amenable to subsequent revision, remained standard for centuries and are still actively debated today.


The Criterion for Distinguishing Legal Opinions from Judicial Rulings and the Administrative Acts of Judges and Rulers Related Books

The Criterion for Distinguishing Legal Opinions from Judicial Rulings and the Administrative Acts of Judges and Rulers
Language: en
Pages: 353
Authors: Shihab al‑Din al‑Qarafi
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2017-05-23 - Publisher: Yale University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The first and much-needed English translation of a thirteenth-century text that shaped the development of Islamic law in the late middle ages. Scholars of Islam
The Criterion for Distinguishing Legal Opinions from Judicial Rulings and the Administrative Acts of Judges and Rulers
Language: en
Pages: 353
Authors: Shihab al‑Din al‑Qarafi
Categories: Political Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2017-01-01 - Publisher: Yale University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Cover -- Half Title -- Title -- Copyright -- Dedication -- Contents -- Note on Transliteration and Usage -- Preface -- Translator's Introduction -- The Criterio
The Middle East and North Africa
Language: en
Pages: 498
Authors: Florian Zemmin
Categories: History
Type: BOOK - Published: 2024-11-04 - Publisher: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This volume collects reflections on secularity from the Middle East and North Africa. To highlight proximate connections as well as resonances with debates else
The Middle East and North Africa
Language: en
Pages: 509
Authors: Florian Zemmin, Neguin Yavari, Markus Dressler, Nurit Stadler
Categories:
Type: BOOK - Published: 2024-07-15 - Publisher: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Public Reason and Courts
Language: en
Pages: 397
Authors: Silje A. Langvatn
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2020-06-04 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

A comprehensive study of public reason for courts, with contributions from leading scholars in philosophy, political science and law.